Opposition addresses super gender gap

by |

The Federal Government has been called on to address the current inequality that exists for women in superannuation.

By the time they are 85 women make up 66% of the population, but are 2.5 times more likely than men to live in poverty in retirement, according to ABS reports.

Accounting and advisory firm William Buck suggested a number of initiatives, such as providing a woman’s partner with the ability to make tax-deductible contributions to the superannuation account of their wife or partner while they are on maternity leave, and providing women returning to the workforce with higher tax-deductible contribution limits to recover the ground they’ve lost.

Co-founder of Aspire Retire, Olivia Maragna is a strong advocator of women in super, and says she would love to see a family contributions cap, or the ability to carry forward unused contributions caps.

When asked how the Opposition would address this issue, Senator Mathias Cormann did not agree to implement the suggestions, but said that their Paid Parental Leave scheme will pay superannuation benefits to help women’s superannuation balances while they take time out of the workforce to care for their newborns.

“Higher contribution caps allow women to catch up by contributing more to their superannuation when they are able and more generous co-contribution benefits for lower income earners are particularly beneficial for women,” said Cormann.

The problem is not only around women taking time off for children, says Maragna. “There are a lot of women out there who do run their own small business, and around about half of those aren’t contributing money into super full stop. That’s a big thing.”

She says everyone can do their part to address the issue, and there are a number of things that advisers need to think about, including different priorities that women have.

“Advisers play a role in educating their clients around what they can be doing prior to having kids and taking time off work. There needs to be more advocation around some of these incentives that the Government does give you, around basic financial strategies.”

Interesting facts:

  • Average super payout for women is 43% less than male counterpart
  • Women’s top priorities in advisers are rapport, recommendation or trusted service, and recognised qualifications. Men look for investment expertise, independence, and business reputation
  • Women prioritise spending quality time with family and being a good parent above being financially prepared
  • Geoff on 18/06/2013 11:43:05 AM

    Too easy Mark. Anyone should be able to make own contributions direct, up to the limits set - no 10%, no mandatory S/Sacrifice, no "spouse" contribution, no co - contibution. You put the money away, tax deductible or rebate, to top up your own Super.
    Why is this not so?

  • Mark Thompson on 18/06/2013 9:59:22 AM

    I agree 100%. Let's get rid of all the contrived rules around super that direct money into Industry Funds. Wouldn't life be simple if there were no 10% Rule, or special spouse contribution formulas. Why not allow anyone under age 65 to have the Concessional amount paid for them, by them or in any combination. Look at the hassles now of making sure that Super Salary Sacrifice doesn't breach the Concessional Cap. Ideally a worker should be able to top up their own Concessional Cap prior to the end of June and do the same for their spouse.

WP forum is the place for positive industry interaction and welcomes your professional and informed opinion.

Name (required)
Comment (required)
By submitting, I agree to the Terms & Conditions