Fraud rife in financial services sector

by |

Fraud is no doubt a problem within Australia, according to the latest KPMG survey of fraud, bribery and corruption in Australia and New Zealand. But the biggest culprit, accounting for 86% in 2012 and 93% in 2011, is the financial services sector.

Of the $372.7m losses reported by respondents, $322.2m came from financial services organisations. Association of Independently Owned Financial Professionals executive director Peter Johnston said a lot of this fraud was coming from further up the line, in the funds management area, rather than the financial planners.

He said $150m of that $372.7m was probably from Astarra-Trio, when international crime gangs were getting access to the money. “Financial planners were satisfied that all the research reports were in order and all the trustee reports were in order,” he said. “Someone failed to go up to Hong Kong and say ‘show me the money’.”

AFA CEO Brad Fox also says that the various bans ASIC made throughout the past few years were typically not licenced financial planners.

“They’ve actually been unlicensed individuals that have still been committing some sort of fraud with some sort of financial services aspect to it, but it’s not that they’re actually advisers that are doing the wrong thing,” he said.

But both men agree that whoever is committing it, is tarnishing the reputation of qualified financial professionals across the country.

So who is the typical fraudster? According to the survey, he is male (75% of fraud was committed by men); earns less than $100,000p/a (though this is slowly starting to change, with a 92% increase in the number of offenders earning between $100-200,000); and holds a non-managerial position within his/her company.

Furthermore, most have a clean criminal background, proving that due diligence, including insolvency, track record and integrity checks, needs to be robust. The main motivation to commit fraud in 2010 was greed, at 93%. This dropped to 31% last year and was overtaken by financial pressure at 36%.

KPMG reinforces the importance of prevention when it comes to dealing with fraudulent activity, saying that staff-screening, developing a corporate code of ethics, renewing/improving internal controls and conducting fraud awareness training are the most popular methods used to nip the problem in the bud.

More stories:

Take action now, beat the budget

AFSL breaches put quality of advice at risk

10 traps of SMSF borrowing advice

 

  • Frank Smith on 12/02/2013 12:58:19 PM

    The Financial Services Industry is as vast as it is diverse so yet another article throwing unfair and misleading information on to the huge majority of financial advisers who are trying to do the right thing. I don't suppose for one minute there is any fraud in the various levels of Government.

  • alleycat on 13/02/2013 4:34:49 PM

    How interesting for KPMG to reinforcce prevention when it was they back in 2007 who failed to report in their annual audit of MFS investment Management Ltd that the company through a loan agreement with RBOS transferred $147.5m of debt onto investor assets.
    Are they still subject to a class action under their PI ? who knows ?

WP forum is the place for positive industry interaction and welcomes your professional and informed opinion.

Name (required)
Comment (required)
By submitting, I agree to the Terms & Conditions