Amend the “shortcomings” of the significant investor visa program: AVCAL

by |
The government can’t lose the opportunity to look into the shortcomings of Australia’s significant investor visa program in its just-announced review of the regime, say AVCAL.

The Australian Private Equity & Venture Capital Association Limited (AVCAL) is urging the government to consider expanding the program to include intermediated investments through private equities and venture capital funds.

CEO Yasser El-Ansary said the program is now an essential part of the policy framework and it helps to make Australia an attractive destination for foreign capital; however, it is lacking this asset class.

“There is no policy basis to justify excluding these funds from the significant investor visa regime, and so that should be addressed by the government as part of the wholesale review into the existing rules in this area,” he said.

AVCAL has campaigned for some time that the list of eligible asset classes should be expanded to allow high net worth business migrants to play a more significant role in supporting investment in small and medium sized enterprises across all sectors of the Australian economy.

Many other countries, including the US, Singapore, New Zealand and the UK, use such programs to attract foreign investments, El-Ansary said.

“Our economy is in the middle of major structural transformation across many industry sectors, and so we need to look at every opportunity to support investment in Australian businesses that can compete in a globalised marketplace”.

Businesses must be innovative, and boosting the availability of capital investment is vital in supporting the development of new technologies and processes, he added.

AVCAL listed the extension of the significant investor visa regime as one of three key policy reforms that should be adopted as part of the looming 2014-15 federal budget.

SEE MORE:

AVCAL concerned disclosure will hurt super members

Private equities value already surpass entire 2013 financial year

Treasurer rebuffs super rule change call





 
  • terry on 10/04/2014 11:22:58 PM

    There is huge anger towards this program among Australians trying to by a house.

    WHY?

    It is very simple economics. Very very simple and very very obvious. But still too complex for Australian policy makers to understand.

    So try hard. Here it is:::

    If you are Chinese and buy a house you get
    1. The house
    2. Citizenship for the whole family. /
    3. Healthcare for the whole family for free. YOu can fly grandma in from China for the eye operation and return her the next day. All on the tax payers of Australias bill.
    4. You will get a free selective school for your children.
    5. You will get free university for your children and those of the extended family.

    If you are Australian and want to buy the same house you get

    1. The house.

    Now this situation creates a huge distortion in the market. Foreigners are prepared to pay more than the Australians because they get more!

    This is grossly unfair.

    It provides huge distortion in the market.


    It is resulting in a rapidly inflating housing market.


    Huge anger towards the government who introduced this unfair and shortsighted scheme.

    It must be stopped.

    Do you not understand this is unfair to Australians?

  • James on 11/04/2014 10:21:21 AM

    A population of over 1 Billion being allowed and encouraged to buy houses in a country with a population of 23mil. All with cheap offshore loans (or none at all).

    Enough said.

WP forum is the place for positive industry interaction and welcomes your professional and informed opinion.

Name (required)
Comment (required)
By submitting, I agree to the Terms & Conditions